Andy Gapin Instagram

Our Idiot Brother

September 7, 2011 - 2:53 pm

Given my obsession with Zooey Deschanel, checking out Our Idiot Brother was obviously a requirement for me, even if it took an extra week. But Zooey aside, the cast for the movie is pretty stacked. And for the most part, that’s what the movie became to me, a showcase of actors and actresses that I enjoy.

Our Idiot Brother isn’t a strong movie in any real sense, but Paul Rudd makes it work in the way that he pulls most things off. The story is just average and doesn’t really progress along too much. It feels as though it’s trying to tell a little too much at once. While most of the film tries to focus on the relationship between Paul Rudd’s character and his three sisters, a lot of time is still spent developing the individual lives of all four characters before everything can really culminate in Rudd ruining each of his sister’s lives–or rather exposing how they’ve ruined their own lives. Because of the three sisters, each of with coming with a male (female in Zooey’s case) counterpart, there was a lot of Rudd to spread around. Three may work well in theory, but I felt as though there were too many relationships to build.

Like I said, the movie itself is mostly average, but I walked away from Our Idiot Brother with a few other thoughts:

  • Zooey Deschanel and Rashida Jones as a lesbian couple is almost too much to handle.
  • I’ve said it a thousand times before, but Steve Coogan needs to be in a million more things. Everything, really.
  • I’m really glad Adam Scott is on Parks and Recreation now and I’d also like to see him in a million more things.
  • Elizabeth Banks looks even better with as a brunette than she does as a blonde.

Despite having a thousand relationships to build out, if you need a few laughs and are interested in any of the things I’ve just mentioned, Our Idiot Brother could be well worth the cost of an AM cinema ticket on a rainy weekend morning.

Rating: B-


Dinner for Schmucks

August 9, 2010 - 5:03 pm

If not for Steve Carell and Paul Rudd, Dinner for Schmucks wouldn’t have been worth the trip to the theater. The movie had so much potential, but unfortunately, is simply average.

Dinner for Schmucks doesn’t break any new ground and isn’t terribly original. At times, it actually feels more like a spoof film than anything else. This feeling was enough to make me realize that Steve Carell needs to stick with characters that have a much lower degree of awkwardness instead of taking on roles that are nothing more than dumbed down versions of Michael Scott.

I laughed a bunch, but still felt letdown by the execution of what could have been a much better movie idea. With Paul Rudd, Steve Carell, Jemaine Clement, Zach Galifianakis, and Ron Livingston, the cast was there, but the script just wasn’t strong enough to make it happen. Netflix this one in a few months.

Rating: C